The /. This discussion has been archived. (which is still very interesting). You are confusing "a theory" and "the theory of xyz". We see an infinite universe expanding into itself. Let's assume for a moment what the JWTS shows "disproves" the Big Bang. If anyone can enlighten me on what that subject is I'd appreciate it. For every retirement age scientist who doesn't want to believe that everything they've studied in their career is wrong (and I suspect there are not very many that feel this way) there is another who is just starting out who is delighted by the prospect that there are new things to discover. In particle physics, "supersymmetry" is a proposed type of space-time symmetry that relates two basic classes of elementary particles: bosons, which have an integer-valued spin, and fermions, which have a half-integer spin. The Big Bang, first proposed in 1927, posited that the universe started as an incredibly hot, dense single point that exploded, triggering a constant expansion of the known universe. Slight difference though when you are speaking of the very limits of human knowledge, or if you are about to set policy to engage in a 20 year cluster-fuck because you half-assed your intelligence and evaluating your capabilities. Pierre wrote the committee and declined to be nominated without Marie being co-nominated. Suppose you want to form a theory that explains the disappearance of . It's true there are some puzzles for astronomers to solve here, but, so far, they aren't rewriting the beginning of the universe to do so. My own research group (which is diligently testing the idea of the real-world supersymmetry) involves about 3,000 scientists drawn from across the world. Well quantum goes against Einstein and makes lots of useful predictions. Like you can't believe what you see, it's not real. Don Lincoln contributed this article to Live Science's Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights. makes a big mistake. That's absolutely nothing like how it would really happen. What else would explain how matter formed? A lot of things are currently happening with the Coopers, but it's Young Sheldon season 6's most boring arc that's justifying a glaring The Big Bang Theory finale plot hole. If youre interested in learning more about the Fermilab future research program and these possible future Nobel prizes, I even made a video about it. She said they "support the Big Bang model because they show us that early galaxies were different than the galaxies we see today -- they were much smaller!". Scientists are mostly pretty normal people, with normal lives. A big chunk of the plot focuses on who would get the Nobel Prize, if it were awarded. Ehhno. A lot of times it seems like, on Slashdot, people think an paper posted to arXiv equates to completely settled science. Cosmology and particle physics overlap quite a bit. summary is misleading. People even called her phone. Its not necessarily bad if its not peer reviewed yet, at the very least it will have references of related papers that are. **** Reason #1 Physics Letters B offers authors considerable latitude to speculate and engage in "what if" physics. "It upset me because there are a lot of people very interested in science, but who don't have the background to distinguish fact from fiction, and they read something like this and think it's true.". "Sometimes, a new idea completely . You mean like your insistence that Rosetta 2 is not an emulator? 2. Our image of the day, 'Star Trek: Picard' episode 3 marks the emotional return of Deanna Troi, Artemis astronauts may be able to spray away sticky moon dust, UAE astronaut mascot 'Suhail' flies again as SpaceX Crew-6 zero-g indicator, Your monthly guide to stargazing & space science, Subscribe today and save an extra 5% with code 'LOVE5', Issues delivered straight to your door or device. "Yes, and fuck that second guy in particular. The new observations may well have an explanation that only invokes a modified "Big Bang Theory". Apparently. Kirkpatrick has stated her quotes were misused and even changed her Twitter name to "Allison the Big Bang happened Kirkpatrick. What theoretical physicists often do is create a theory with lots of symmetry, but then break it, to explain our world. Visit our corporate site (opens in new tab). They tell Sheldon if he can get the President of Caltech to nominate the three of them for the Nobel, combined with the nomination from the head of Fermilab, they'd have a strong case for receiving the honor. So this episode was brought to my attention becausewellFermilab. Nobody has panicked. "JWST is designed to find the very earliest galaxies in the universe," Allison Kirkpatrick, an astrophysicist at the University of Kansas, told Space.com. Rather, Kirkpatrick is reckoning with the first data coming back from the JWST about the early evolution of the universe. Answer (1 of 25): It's very unlikely that the Big Bang theory would be entirely disproven. Most television is supposed to be entertaining. The one Lerner pushes apparently is full of holes. Or space? There are only five episodes left in the final season, and much of the season thus far has been devoted to advancing this particular subplot. Well, as far as I know, the evidence still points to older stars having less metals, meaning the astronomical definition of metals, anything other then hydrogen and helium.With our understanding of life, or life as we know it, means only so much time for civilizations to evolve and a lot of things had to go right for us to be here, including 4.5 billion years of a fairly stable Earth.Be interesting if we can figure out what these ancient (according to the Big bang Theory) galaxies are made out of. Or literally every one of your positions on COVID? Even when its most obvious defect was pointed out, that things that burned gained rather than lost weight, they just suggested phlogiston had negative weight. In fact, David Saltzberg of UCLA is both a research collaborator of mine and a scientific consultant for the show. In the intervening decades, observations have only strengthened the case for the Big. It's also important to noteWebb is not built to see and undertake new analyses of the CMBitself. New evidence that modifies a theory is not the same as disproving a theory.Also, Betteridge's theory of headlines applies. Science is about making incremental progress in our understanding, coming to increasingly stronger conclusions based on observations. The season, as well as the series, concluded on May 16, 2019. Yarn is the best search for video clips by quote. The Big Bang Theory (2007) - S11E24 The Bow Tie Asymmetry clip with quote Super asymmetry? Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. After his wife tussles with Penny (Kaley Cuoco), Mrs. Fowler encourages him to take action.. The researchers were studying a subatomic particle called kaons and the measurement and prediction (how it should. IIUC, string theories can get rid of the singularities. -- Retirement Age Scientist. What felt wrong with it? It's certainly not a disproof of the big bang. Soc., 56, 403. Cosmology's standard model describes how the first galaxies were formed through a hierarchical process, involving small clouds of gas and clusters of stars coming together to form larger nascent galaxies. There was some cross-immunity from various other coronavirii that fall under the category of the common cold, and natural immunity(which was in fact recognized by the EU as a reason for not needing the vaccine) if you had already had the virus thus making the vaccine completely irrelevant for those individuals. Spice up your small talk with the latest tech news, products and reviews. Yeah, I know there has to be some prevailing theory to try to describe those observations in the absence of anything else, that is how science works, but our observations really are infinitesimally limited at this single point in space and time, JWST notwithstanding. Director Kristy Cecil Writers Chuck Lorre Bill Prady Steve Holland (teleplay) Stars Johnny Galecki Jim Parsons Kaley Cuoco The episode had a mix of fiction, truth and almost truth, but it got me wondering what sorts of research at Fermilab might actually get the Nobel Prize. According to Big Bang theory, the most distant galaxies in the JWST images are seen as they were only 400-500 million years after the origin of the universe. For us, it's coach all the way. I don't think the Raelians or the simulation nuts go in for a seven-day creation either. "Denialism costs lives. And number 5, they insist that science has to be perfect in order to be credible.". Keith Cooper is a freelance science journalist and editor in the United Kingdom, and has a degree in physics and astrophysics from the University of Manchester. The Earth began to cool The autotrophs began to drool, Neanderthals developed tools We built the Wall We built the pyramids Far more often, art imitates life. You can follow him on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/Dr.Don.Lincoln). The concept of super-asymmetry is related to super-symmetry string theory. Science on television is rarely exactly right and that's OK. Lerner is a plasma universe guy. There are even a couple examples of this higher up in this discussion, actually. A theory is scientific if it produces testable predictions. Recent observations by the James Webb Space Telescope have not disproven the big bang, despite certain popular articles claiming otherwise. That was just mean. No matter how much evidence supports a theory, to disprove it it's only necessary to provide evidence that invalidates it; how and when that happens is - up to a point - a matter of scientific consensus, which certainly hasn't happened here yet, but that's the acid test. That these early galaxies seem a little more evolved than expected in JWST's observations is an intriguing astrophysical puzzle that confounds current models of galaxy growth. Check the source is it from a reputable source such as a peer-reviewed journal or a mainstream news site? What it finds there will almost certainly reshape our views on the early universe, galaxies and the evolution of the cosmos. DUNE will study the behavior of neutrinos and antimatter neutrinos to look for differences. There is no center or edge to the explosion." There was no place outside of the Big Bang, so it was not expanding into anything. So to bolster evidence the Big Bang theory is incorrect, you'd need to explain the CMB another way. "The Big Bang Theory," the CBS sitcom about a pair of socially awkward physicists from the California Institute of Technology, their egghead friends, and the one . I think the time cube guy died, but maybe someone can take up that torch too? He also produces aseries of YouTube videos about particle physics and cosmologyfor the public. After Mockery, Mark Zuckerberg Promises Better Metaverse Graphics, Posts New Avatar, Free, Secure, and Open-Source: How FileZilla is Making an Old School Protocol Cool Again, "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all." how much caffeine in taster's choice instant coffee. It was a fringe theory until the evidence for it was so overwhelming that the scientific establishment was forced to give it a hearing. No, fuck you, if he explained what happened or not is a known unknown to you, and yet you pretended to know it anyway. It makes sense why it's caught fire: It's a controversial idea that upends what we think we know about the cosmos. We'll call that a split. 3. Who else agrees can you find other accredited experts from mainstream institutions who are in agreement, or at least provide some validity? Live Science is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Dr. Saltberg: Theoreticians love symmetrical equations, but the world around us is clearly asymmetrical. The one who killed all the first born males in Egypt to punish pharoah until he released a certain group rather than simply killing pharoah himself (it's perfectly logical, really). OK, well then. That's bad enough in everyday life; for the government it can be disastrous. More likely they're thinking, "Hey, that's interesting!". New Moai statue that 'deified ancestors' found on Easter Island, Lab-grown minibrains will be used as 'biological hardware' to create new biocomputers, scientists propose, Ancient Roman 'spike defenses' made famous by Julius Caesar found in Germany, 'Building blocks of life' recovered from asteroid Ryugu are older than the solar system itself, The ultimate action-packed science and technology magazine bursting with exciting information about the universe, Subscribe today and save an extra 5% with checkout code 'LOVE5', Engaging articles, amazing illustrations & exclusive interviews, Issues delivered straight to your door or device. Qualifications is the writer with a university or reputable institution, or are they an 'independent researcher' with no accreditation? The show states that this notion revolves around subatomic particles known as kaons and how they react to certain stimuli and situations. We can't go back and look. Supersymmetry concerns subatomic particles from which everything else is made. The age of galaxies out to 13.5 billion years? I'm old enough to retire and my reaction was, great, more data. The universe doesn't have a center. Later, Sheldon meets up with Leonard, Howard, and Raj to complain. Hold on to your hats, here come the Creationsists, absurd to suggest this "disproves the big bang", Re:Just goes to show - I took in it in the ass fro. He even wrote a book titled The Big Bang Never Happened in 1991. (Well, I didn't read the paper, but the question isn't that impossible to come up with answers to. [1] [2] The series returned to its regular Thursday night time slot on September 27, 2018. And by the way, the only good explanation for why all the light from those galaxies is so red-shifted is that the universe has expanded by a large factor since then. However, what we are talking about here is called "early conjecture", nothing is "disproven" at this time. Delivered on weekdays. Adilson Motter, Northwestern UniversityAfter 12 successful seasons, "The Big Bang Theory" has finally come to a fulfilling end, concluding its reign as the longest running multicamera sitcom . The Fermilab CMS group is made up of about 100 scientists and even more engineers, technicians and computer professionals. Read 10 answers by scientists to the question asked by Ralph Brckner on Mar 1, 2023 It's a tongue-in-cheek reference, not a cosmological crisis. New York, ", A conclusion that can only be drawn by blindly accepting the most. He conducts his research using the Compact Muon Solenoid detector located at the Large Hadron Collider. S12, Ep10 . "one does not question the scientific status quo with words alone.". Easily move forward or backward to get to the perfect clip. Of all the theories of advanced physics, that one seemed most reasonable to me. Vesto Slipher, (1917): Proc. The Big Bang theory-haters all aspire to be cosmic revolutionariesand that's precisely what all scientists want to be, too. Traditional Big Bang theory predicts that there should be small differences in temperature, clumpiness of large clusters of galaxies and other properties. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead. Wait! He also founded measure theory, which applies the theory of sets to the theory of functions, and thus became an originator, with Henri Lebesgue and Ren Louis . He is the author of "The Large Hadron Collider: The Extraordinary Story of the Higgs Boson and Other Stuff That Will Blow Your Mind (opens in new tab)" (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014), and he produces a series of science education videos. The JWST provides an intriguing look at the early universe, but it's not yet rewriting fundamental theories of the cosmos. [Image: Inside the World's Top Physics Labs]. Click on the "predicted based on a non-expanding universe" link and download the PDF - the author gets right into redshift from the introduction on. There are two points early in Lerner's article which show this: The first point is just a case of Lerner missing the pun. But The Big Bang Theory did what seemed impossible, getting Teller to actually speak on camera. Currently at Fermilab, an experiment called g-2 (G minus 2) is studying how subatomic particles called muons wobble when put in a magnetic field. I read about that over a decade ago as a blurb in some cosmology article in some science magazine. Kirkpatrick said. Find the exact moment in a TV show, movie, or music video you want to share. (NPR 5-15-19). The telescope can't "see" that far back in time. Are we rethinking the Big Bang? Those people will now say, "See! Helplessly going wherever facts and reason dictate is indiscernible from flip flopping when you lack a basic understanding of scientific principles. The Big Bang Hypothesis - which states the universe has been expanding since it began 14 billion years ago in a hot and dense state - is contradicted by the new James Webb Space Telescope images, writes Eric Lerner. One of the chief reasons the Big Bang theory stands up is because of the cosmic microwave background. I have a feeling it's just another bombastic claim by an article writer and no one who is actually a real scientist "is panicking" over this at all. Technically the cosmological redshift is not a Doppler effect. Getting through to science deniers is difficult, admits McIntyre, because their instinct is to distrust what they are being told by experts or authority figures. Jupiter and Venus 'kiss' in a stunning planetary conjunction tonight. He makes sure that the writers don't include any scientific topic that is too outlandish and disreputable. The mathematical underpinnings of the Big Bang theory include Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity along with standard theories of fundamental particles. So, I'll generously give them this one. If only someone could compile a list of problems. In the episode, Sheldon and Amy's work on their Super Asymmetry theory (more on that later) put them in the running for a Nobel Prize. There's famous people who still don't believe the earth is round. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Um, "a theory" is as good as you get in "the true principles of science". One puzzling feature of the universe is how smooth it is at large scales. Light loses energy as it travels through space. Because it stopped being useful. He used to be a scientist but he realized he was not very happy sitting at a lab bench all day. He also owns a lot of ugly Christmas sweaters. The twelfth and final season of the American television sitcom The Big Bang Theory premiered on CBS on September 24, 2018. That is what Rudy said [yahoo.com]. Just because you scream "listen to the science" doesn't mean you actually know what the science and data says. Although issues with calibrating the instruments might mean that some of these galaxies are not as distant as first thought, JWST has almost certainly broken the record with some of them. What they're saying is if you question an established theory you must provide your evidence to show why it's wrong and/or why your theory is better. Raj says he shouldn't worry because "super-asymmetry is your paper. And the writers try not to stray too far away from real science in their episodes. Comments owned by the poster. Not sure what happened. There's no literal theoretical claim of a singularity. Having a starting point obviously makes our rudimentary mathematical formulas fit better, but it stretches credulity in a common sense sort of way. That's the definition of 'creationist,' so yes. If galaxies formed that early it probably means the conditions shortly after the big bang were more conducive to star and galaxy formation than was previously believed. But there was a lot wrong with the description in the TV episode. They won't provide any evidence to the contrary other than, "It's in the Bible" which is of course not evidence since they can't show evidence for their supposed supreme being. Don Lincoln is a senior scientist at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory and an adjunct professor of physics at the University of Notre Dame. If you're going to completely disprove the big bang theory, you're going to need to come up with some other explanation for background radiation [wikipedia.org]. "If we start getting all these conspiracy theories in astronomy, if people are willing to believe those, does it make them more willing to believe other conspiracy theories?". Jupiter's auroras look radiant in new James Webb Space Telescope images. As the paper's author points out, that's a pretty expensive fix to make the theory work, whereas he claims the theory advanced, that the universe is not expanding and redshift occurs for some other (currently unknown) reason, requires (at the moment) no other such fixups. how and when that happens is - up to a point - a matter of scientific consensus, which certainly hasn't happened here yet, but that's the acid test. However, as of yet there is no evidence for SUSY. 6 ways to avoid falling victim to science deniers: JWST's deepest image of the universe taken so far, containing potentially the most distant galaxies ever seen. Right now, it is too early to *know* what these results mean. [1][2] The series returned to its regular Thursday time slot on September 27, 2018. Unfortunately, a couple of scientists got caught up in social media hype and hyperbole and used a poor choice of words. A physicist reflects on the show's made-up Nobel Prize-winning theory of 'super asymmetry' along with how the series showcased authentic science and role models for future STEM students. and a "cold" left hemisphere, ratio- Like filters, different representations nal and "evil", . But modern experimental groups have way more than two people on them. Acid test? Or a hand job alone. Some people grumble about how the show represents the scientists in a cartoonish way, and there is truth in the criticism. These are fundamentally different and the 2nd form is never "just" a theory. Text. No new comments can be posted. Heres how it works. Until proven sufficiently, it remains merely a theory. I just prefer theories that favor larger universesthough I'm not sure about "eternal inflation"), I've never felt that the Big Bang Hypothesis was a theory. They're just smart and very focused on their work. The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has not disproved the Big Bang, despite an article about a pseudoscientific theory that went viral in August, and which mischaracterized quotes from an. TBBT never really felt right, I always just considered it a placeholder till we maybe one day learn more. So this new data will either refine the theory, or the theory will prove so entirely broken it'll be thrown out and a new theory will take its place. It's still too early to say it's disproven, but if this new research holds up and there's no way to make it compatible with the big bang theory then it simply means we don't have a good theory for the origin of the universe. ISSUE 154 FEBRUARY / MARCH 2023. It could well be that the episode's prediction of a Nobel prize for Fermilab will come to pass in spirit, if not in real life. This is simply not true. He writes for the NOVA website, has written cover articles for Scientific American and has published articles for CNN and the Huffington Post. No, they're not. But the Weeb Telescope [reddit.com] might. Always sounded suspect. NASA warns of 3 skyscraper-sized asteroids headed toward Earth this week. Some of them might even be massive and quite evolved at epochs between 200 and 350 million years after the Big Bang; the current confirmed record-holder, from Hubble, was already 407 million years . The paper linked too has all kinds of explanation for how the BBT wasn't correctly predicting redshift we had observed from different galaxies. Um, "a theory" is as good as you get in "the true principles of science". Simply saying, "See, it's wrong!" Now we just need some Natalie Portman and hot grits in the comment. This is supposed to be the last season of "The Big Bang Theory," and I'll be sad to see it go. Political extremism is destroying academia and the solution isn't sinking to the other side's (much lower) level. Co-author of more than 800 scientific papers, his scientific interest is broad, spanning such questions as the nature of dark matter, understanding why we see no antimatter in the universe and whether the familiar quarks and leptons are composed of even smaller particles. It's political because certain segments of society make it political. "Science denial has gotten worse because it's now more of a threat to the wellbeing of our society," McIntyre said. I said plenty, just nothing you're interested in. Sheldon decides that if Amy isn't included on the nomination, that he doesn't want to be on it either and he tells that to the President, who explains how this will result in a fight with Fermilab; he adds that he has their back. As "changing the narrative". The Big Bang theory isn't perfect; no scientific theory is. In the meantime, astronomers continue to learn more about the early universe with the fantastic data coming down from JWST. Even though some felt . Tweet him. Now he has the best job in the world, telling stories about space, the planet, climate change and the people working at the frontiers of human knowledge. Internet, or other sources. The power of new ideas. "Deliberately misleading the public makes it difficult for them to trust real scientists and to know fact from fiction.". I'm not talking about the Eric Lerners of the world, I'm talking about the people who believe him.". This was discovered in 1964. "The first step in science denial is cherrypicking evidence," McIntyre told Space.com. But I've never felt that the Big Bang Hypothesis was a theoryexcept in the very weak sense of "I've got a theory that 'Big Bang's occur repeatedly within the same universe." It's this quote that was later misused. 3:35 AM. it simply means we don't have a good theory for the origin of the universe. . "I saw it and thought 'This is horrible, but it's also nonsense, nobody is going to read this,'" Kirkpatrick said. Total viewers including DVR users 17.35 million. Doesn't this result point more at questions of galaxy formation? "Number 2 is that they lie about conspiracy theories. at the Disco with his title. If CMS discovered supersymmetry, the credit wouldn't go to just two researchers from Fermilab. I for one am excited that Slashdot is carrying electric universe stories again. "The next thing I know, everybody has read it!". The surprising finding that galaxies in the early universe are more plentiful, and a little more massive and structured than expected, doesn't mean that the Big Bang is wrong. no one who is actually a real scientist "is panicking" over this at all. Season chronology. Scientific theories can -- and should -- be challenged by well-reasoned scientists presenting highly detailed and thoughtful arguments. Now this twat is jumping on it as proof that he is right and everyone else is wrong. It's no coincidence the same paragraph links to LPPFusion, a company run by Lerner aimed at developing clean energy technologies. The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. An hypothesis is a testable prediction. To begin with, there is no real theory called Super Asymmetry. Well, I've never been happy with "hyper inflation" and "spontaneous symmetry breaking", but this doesn't mean they aren't correct. The observations astrophysicists and cosmologists have made over decades line up with the Big Bang theory. Published works there do not necessarily need to pertain to known physical reality. this would seriously challenge current cosmological thinking, Lots of surprises, and not necessarily pleasant ones, and wondering if everything I've done is wrong, predicted based on a non-expanding universe, More Evidence Covid-19 Originated at Wuhan Market in Two New Studies, Fourth Shot 'is Necessary', Pfizer CEO Says, 'To Keep Students in STEM fields, Let's Weed Out the Weed-Out Math Classes', Moderna CEO: 400% Price Hike on COVID Vaccine 'Consistent With the Value', Or the universe is older than current theory, What we know better is how little we know, Re:What we know better is how little we know, Important quote from summary, for Slashdotters. The author of the article, an independent researcher named Eric Lerner, has been a serial denier of the Big Bang since the late 1980s, preferring his personal pseudoscientific alternative. After all a lot of the physics and scales are based on the assumption that the speed of light is constant. 2023 CNET, a Red Ventures company. It takes a fair bit of time to compare the prediction to data; and it takes even more time to rule out all of the other predictions. Lerner's article gathered steam across social media, being shared widely on Twitter and across Facebook, over the last week. And it's a fantastic place to work if you are fascinated by the subatomic world, which I am, and that means I get to drive to work every day with a smile.